In response to accusations of a cartel, gas company GRTU has denied any such involvement – claims made by rival Liquigas – and further described its rival as a company with “no limits to arrogance.”
Liquigas previously accused GRTU of forming a cartel with 23 fuel distributors. Since, GRTU said it would hold Liquigas accountable for damages caused by the claims and has lodged complaints that it has been blocked from distributing gas cylinders.
Reports say the dispute between the companies stems from a 1992 agreement between competition regulators and the gas companies that offered territorial exclusivity for the gas companies’ operations.
That report, GRTU said, is still valid but is being challenged before the Competition and Consumer Appeals Tribunal. The court will decide the legality of the agreement, the company said, not Liquigas.
Full content: Times of Malta
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI