Vivien Rose, Apr 30, 2009
This article considers the circumstances in which a court, faced with a challenge to a decision taken by a primary decision-maker, accords a margin of appreciation to that decision-maker by limiting the intensity of its review. It compares the concept of the margin of appreciation as applied by the Community Courts in the application of Article 81 with that of the domestic courts in the United Kingdom when they are dealing with challenges based on directly effective Community rights or alleged breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights. The article examines how discussion of the existence and scope of the margin is influenced by the reviewing court´s perception of its role in administrative challenges more generally and whether the position of a specialist tribunal established to hear a particular kind of case is different from the position of a generalist court.
Featured News
Live Nation Pushes Back on States’ Renewed Bid for DOJ Settlement Records
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
California Subpoenas OpenAI as Scrutiny of AI Cybersecurity Risks Grows
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Faces Antitrust Suit Over $650 Million Casetext Acquisition
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Sandoz Agrees to $400 Million Deal to Resolve States’ Generic-Drug Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon e-Book Buyers Move Closer to Class Certification in Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton