Vivien Rose, Apr 30, 2009
This article considers the circumstances in which a court, faced with a challenge to a decision taken by a primary decision-maker, accords a margin of appreciation to that decision-maker by limiting the intensity of its review. It compares the concept of the margin of appreciation as applied by the Community Courts in the application of Article 81 with that of the domestic courts in the United Kingdom when they are dealing with challenges based on directly effective Community rights or alleged breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights. The article examines how discussion of the existence and scope of the margin is influenced by the reviewing court´s perception of its role in administrative challenges more generally and whether the position of a specialist tribunal established to hear a particular kind of case is different from the position of a generalist court.
Featured News
Following EU, Canada Unveils AI Sovereignty Plan
Jun 5, 2026 by
CPI
New Coalition Targets Legal Framework for Public-Private Cyber Operations
Jun 5, 2026 by
CPI
EU Pauses Review of UPM-Sappi’s €1.42 Billion Paper Venture
Jun 4, 2026 by
CPI
Bipartisan House Lawmakers Unveil Draft Bill to Limit State Regulation of AI
Jun 4, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Moves to Throw Out Consumer Challenge to Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition
Jun 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani