
Tinder’s founders just won a partial victory in their lawsuit against Match over alleged financial trickery. Match has agreed to settle the case by paying $441 million from its cash reserves, reported The Wall Street Journal. In return, the Tinder co-creators will dismiss the claims from both the lawsuit and linked arbitration.
The court battle began in 2018, when the plaintiffs accused Tinder’s parent organizations Match and IAC of manipulating financial data (including a secret merger with Match) to artificially lower Tinder’s valuation and illegally deny stock options to workers. The plaintiffs also alleged that interim Tinder chief Greg Blatt sexually harassed marketing VP and co-founder Rosette Pambakian in 2016. Tinder fired the employees in response to their lawsuit, and Pambakian separately sued Blatt, IAC and Match Group over the assault claims.
Tinder, the product of an IAC incubator for startups, was launched in 2012. Match, Tinder’s parent company, had been an IAC subsidiary but was spun out as a public company in 2015.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs said part of their compensation from Match and IAC came in the form of Tinder stock options that were set to convert to Match shares in 2017.
As part of the settlement, the plaintiffs agreed to drop all their claims against Match that are on trial and in arbitration, Match said, adding that it plans to pay the settlement using cash it has on hand.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li