Lawyers representing Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, clashed with the U.S. government on Tuesday regarding the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) plan to strengthen a privacy order dating back to 2019, reported Reuters.
In May, the FTC accused Meta of providing misleading information to parents concerning the extent of control they had over their children’s interactions within the Messenger Kids app, among other concerns. As a response, the FTC proposed modifications to the existing privacy agreement, which would prohibit profiting from minors’ data.
James Rouhandeh, representing Meta, argued before U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Kelly in the District of Columbia that the FTC lacked the authority to enforce these changes because Meta had not consented to them. He stated, “They (the FTC) do need consent to modify. Because this is a contract, they need consent to modify it.”
Related: Meta Wins Ruling Against FTC In VR Purchase Case
On the other side of the argument, Zachary Cowan, representing the FTC within the Justice Department, contended that it was the FTC’s prerogative to decide whether adjustments to settlements were necessary, and the district court had no jurisdiction over this matter.
Judge Kelly expressed his skepticism regarding Meta’s jurisdictional claims and indicated that he would likely make a ruling before November 30.
The primary point of contention revolves around whether Meta and the FTC, in the event of failing to reach an agreement, would turn to the district court or an FTC judge to determine the fate of the 2019 agreement.
The proposed changes put forth by the FTC include prohibiting Facebook from profiting from data collected on users under the age of 18, including within its virtual reality business. Additionally, Facebook would face more stringent restrictions on the use of facial recognition technology.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI