Meta has appealed against the European Union’s “gatekeeper” designations for its Messenger and Marketplace platforms. This marks the first instance of a major tech company challenging the new regulations established by the European Union under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
The EU’s latest crackdown on Big Tech, initiated in September, selected 22 “gatekeeper” services operated by six of the world’s largest tech companies to be subject to new rules. Meta’s Facebook, Instagram, Marketplace, and WhatsApp were all identified as gatekeepers, falling under the DMA’s provisions intended to level the competitive playing field between tech giants and smaller competitors, reported Reuters.
A Meta spokesperson emphasized that the appeal is centered on seeking clarity on specific legal points regarding the designations of Messenger and Marketplace under the DMA. The company maintains its unwavering commitment to complying with the DMA and pledges to work collaboratively with the European Commission to ensure compliance.
Read more: Meta Defends Itself Against EU’s Accusations Of Misuse Of Dominance
However, it is noteworthy that Meta has chosen not to challenge the gatekeeper designation for Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The company argues that Marketplace, being a consumer-to-consumer service, does not fit within the definition of an online intermediation service. Additionally, Meta asserts that Messenger is merely a chat functionality of Facebook, distinct from the criteria outlined in the DMA.
The DMA imposes obligations on major tech players such as Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet’s Google, Amazon, Meta, and ByteDance’s TikTok. These obligations include allowing third-party apps or app stores on their platforms and facilitating a smoother transition for users to switch from default apps to alternatives. The overarching aim is to foster a more competitive digital landscape.
In a broader context, European Union antitrust regulators also scrutinize whether Microsoft’s Bing and Apple’s iMessage should comply with the new rules. This underscores the EU’s persistent efforts to regulate the conduct of major tech companies and prevent anti-competitive practices in the digital marketplace.
Meta’s decision to challenge the gatekeeper designation for Messenger and Marketplace introduces a significant legal dimension to the ongoing dialogue between tech giants and regulatory bodies.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh