Meta Platforms on Wednesday completed its acquisition of virtual reality startup Within Unlimited Inc. after winning a high-profile antitrust lawsuit focused on the deal.
The acquisition reportedly valued Within at $400 million. Previously, the Los Angeles-based startup raised $52.5 million in funding from Andreessen Horowitz and more than a half dozen other investors.
Within is the developer of Supernatural, a popular fitness app available on Meta’s Oculus line of VR headsets. Meta first announced plans to buy the startup in October 2021. Last July, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued to block the transaction on antitrust grounds.
Read more: FTC Will Not Appeal Meta VR Acquisition Ruling
The FTC raised concerns that the deal could reduce competition in the VR software market. In its lawsuit, the agency brought two main arguments against allowing the deal to go through.
Read more:
The FTC’s first argument was that acquiring Within and its Supernatural app removed Meta’s incentive to develop a similar VR fitness service in-house. That potential in-house fitness service, the FTC’s lawsuit stated, could have helped increase competition in the VR software market.
The second argument the agency brought centered on a VR game called Beat Saber that Meta had obtained through an earlier acquisition. In the initial version of its lawsuit, the FTC alleged that Beat Saber competes with Within’s Supernatural app. “The two companies currently spur each other to keep adding new features and attract more users, competitive rivalry that would be lost if this acquisition were allowed to proceed,” the FTC stated shortly after filing the suit.
The FTC later removed references to the competition between Supernatural and Beat Saber in its lawsuit. The move came after Meta made the argument that the two apps focus on different use cases. The FTC narrowed the focus of the litigation to its lawsuit’s first argument, which was that the deal removed Meta’s incentive to develop an in-house fitness service similar to Supernatural.
A few days ago, a federal court sided with Meta in the case. The court stated in its 65-page ruling that the FTC provided insufficient evidence to establish the acquisition of Within will negatively impact market competition.
Featured News
College Sports Leaders in Intensive Talks to Settle NIL Antitrust Case Against NCAA
Apr 30, 2024 by
CPI
EU Investigates Facebook’s and Instagram’s Handling of Disinformation Ahead of Elections
Apr 30, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Lawsuit Targets Hotel Giants for Alleged Price Fixing with AI
Apr 30, 2024 by
CPI
ABA Seeks to Join FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Over Antitrust Concerns
Apr 30, 2024 by
CPI
Google Agrees to Pay News Corp for AI-Related Content
Apr 30, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI