The Radio and Television Commission in Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies has approved and ratified two initiatives, seeking to change the Federal Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law. The changes involve eliminating the distinction between an “opinion” and “information” within the media, while also stripping the sector regulator, IFT, of certain powers related to protecting consumers.
The initiatives were put forward simultaneously by deputy Clemente Castañeda Hoeflich of the Movimiento Ciudadano party and by National Action Party (PAN) deputy Federico Döring, moving against the guidelines set by the IFT to protect the rights of audiences and consumers.
First, the legal distinction between “opinion” and “information” would be eliminated, as the distinction has been considered to be arbitrary and limiting of natural forms of expression. Second, Döring’s proposal would strip the IFT from several of its current powers, including the right to impose “cautionary suspensions of broadcasting.” These, he said, could be considered “an act of pre-emptive censorship banned by our constitution.”
Opposing the bill the Mexican Association for the Right to Information (AMEDI) has said that “both initiatives echo a media campaign and the interests of the broadcasting industry, who want to jump through the audience’s rights and strip the IFT’s abilities to influence the sector, despite this being a great social success.” The NGO has called the move an attempt “to counter-reform legislation with political motivations.”
Full Content: Proceso
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Croatian Supermarket Chain Tommy Cleared to Acquire Brodokomerc Nova
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
X and Unilever Settle Antitrust Dispute, Continuing Partnership
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Allows Antitrust Claims Against GoDaddy to Proceed
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Court Ruling Opens Door for Microsoft to Sell Xbox Games on Android Without Google’s Cut
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Realtors Appeal to Supreme Court Over DOJ’s Investigation into Antitrust Violations
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh