In the ongoing antitrust trial against Google, Microsoft has accused Apple of using its search engine, Bing, as a mere bargaining chip in the search-engine wars with Google. Mikhail Parakhin, the head of Microsoft’s advertising and web services, testified that Apple never seriously considered switching to Bing as the default search engine for iPhones reported Bloomberg.
For nearly two decades, Apple has relied on Google as the default search engine in its Safari browser. However, Microsoft has been actively trying to displace Google and make Bing the default search engine for iPhones. Parakhin’s testimony sheds light on the challenges Microsoft has faced in its attempts to compete with Google’s dominance in the search engine market.
During the trial, Parakhin stated, “Apple is making more money on Bing existing than Bing does.” This statement highlights the perception that Apple has been benefiting financially from its partnership with Google, making it less inclined to consider Bing as a viable alternative.
According to Bloomberg, the rivalry between Google and Microsoft in the search-engine arena is not new. Both companies have been vying for dominance and market share for years. However, Microsoft’s claims against Apple reveal the complex dynamics at play in this competitive landscape.
Related: Google Calls Out Microsoft Over Anticompetitive Cloud Practices
Apple’s choice of default search engine holds significant influence over user behavior and revenue generation. Being the default search engine for iPhones would provide a substantial boost to Bing’s user base and potentially increase Microsoft’s advertising revenue. However, Apple’s loyalty to Google has remained steadfast, despite Microsoft’s persistent efforts.
Parakhin’s testimony underscores Microsoft’s frustration with Apple’s approach. He stated that Bing was never given serious consideration, and Apple used it as a bargaining chip in negotiations with Google. This suggests that Apple leveraged Bing’s existence to extract more favorable terms from Google, rather than genuinely considering a switch.
The antitrust trial against Google aims to examine the company’s alleged anti-competitive practices and dominance in the search-engine market. Microsoft’s testimony regarding Apple’s use of Bing as a bargaining chip adds another layer to the complex web of rivalries and negotiations in this industry.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Independent Pharmacies Seek Court Unification in Fight Over Generic Drug Payments
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Drops Controversial Merger Tool Following Court Ruling
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Musk Sues to Stop OpenAI, Citing Antitrust Violations and Public Harm
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korean AI Chipmakers Rebellions and Sapeon Korea Merge to Compete Globally
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Proposes Fines for Big Tech to Boost Fair Competition
Dec 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead