The South African Competition Commission referred the ArcelorMittal and Highveld case to the Competition Tribunal on March 30. The referral follows the Commission’s investigation, which found evidence of collusion to fix prices of flat steel products, whereby Highveld would follow any changes in price initiated by Mittal. The Commission found that Mittal and Highveld may also have conspired to maintain market shares and allocate supply quotas for exports. The collusion was enforced through meetings of the South African Iron and Steel Institute, an industry association.
Featured News
EU Plans to Step Up Enforcement of Digital Rules in the Face of US Opposition
Jan 5, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Closes Antitrust Probe Into DeepSeek After AI Disclosure Commitments
Jan 5, 2026 by
CPI
Ticketmaster Hit With Fresh Antitrust Challenge From Former Startup
Jan 5, 2026 by
CPI
US Courts Poised to Shape the Future of AI Copyright Battles in 2026
Jan 5, 2026 by
CPI
Tyson Foods Reaches $82.5 Million Deal to Resolve Beef Price-Fixing Claims
Jan 5, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi