The South African Competition Commission referred the ArcelorMittal and Highveld case to the Competition Tribunal on March 30. The referral follows the Commission’s investigation, which found evidence of collusion to fix prices of flat steel products, whereby Highveld would follow any changes in price initiated by Mittal. The Commission found that Mittal and Highveld may also have conspired to maintain market shares and allocate supply quotas for exports. The collusion was enforced through meetings of the South African Iron and Steel Institute, an industry association.
Featured News
Google May Be Required to Offer Search Alternatives in UK
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Puts Brakes on BBVA-Sabadell Merger, Deal Faces Uncertain Future
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
In Win For AI Companies, Court Finds AI Training Is Fair Use, But Only From Lawful Sources
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Lawmakers Reintroduce Bipartisan Bill to Curb Big Tech’s App Store Power
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Competition Authority Launches Inspections in Personal Care and Retail Sectors
Jun 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides