The South African Competition Commission referred the ArcelorMittal and Highveld case to the Competition Tribunal on March 30. The referral follows the Commission’s investigation, which found evidence of collusion to fix prices of flat steel products, whereby Highveld would follow any changes in price initiated by Mittal. The Commission found that Mittal and Highveld may also have conspired to maintain market shares and allocate supply quotas for exports. The collusion was enforced through meetings of the South African Iron and Steel Institute, an industry association.
Featured News
Paramount Seeks Judge’s Recusal in State Antitrust Fight Over Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
FCC Chair Suggests CNN Ownership Changes Could Be Ahead
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Investigates Alleged Abuse of Market Power in Superyacht Berthing Sector
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Goodwin Strengthens Antitrust Practice With Strategic San Francisco Hire
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Russia Opens Antitrust Case Against Rusal Over Domestic Aluminum Prices
Jul 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol