A PYMNTS Company

Multi-Sided Platforms Column

 |  December 20, 2015

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    What Twitter, the London Stock Exchange, and eHarmony Have in Common and Why the Capital Markets Industry Should Care – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    Supplement to Platform Economics: The Economics of Multi-Sided Businesses – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    What the Court’s Expert in the Interchange Fee Litigation Said about Analyzing Antitrust for Two-Sided Platforms – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    How Card Regulation is Killing Competition – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    Why the Multi-Sided Platform Literature Kills the P≥MC Result and What It Means for Antitrust – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    Is it Time to Exclude Experts Who Ignore the Multisided Platform Literature? Part I – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    Rivals for Attention – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    A few reflections on the FTC’s decision on Google – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)

    A 2012 progress report on The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platforms – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago) and Richard Schmalensee (GlobalEcon/MIT)

    Market Definition and Merger Analysis for Multi-Sided Platforms – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago) and Richard Schmalensee (GlobalEcon/MIT)

    Multi-Sided Platforms: Introduction to Column – David S. Evans (GlobalEcon/UChicago)