In a development in the ongoing legal battle over name, image, and likeness (NIL) rules in college sports, several states have rallied behind Tennessee’s antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA.
Florida, New York and the District of Columbia have officially joined forces with Tennessee in the lawsuit, amplifying the pressure on the NCAA to reconsider its stance on NIL regulations. The move comes after Virginia had already thrown its weight behind the lawsuit, marking a united front among states seeking to reshape the landscape of collegiate athletics.
The amended complaint, filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee federal court, underscores the collective interest of these states in safeguarding the NIL opportunities for both prospective and current college athletes. The complaint highlights the pivotal role of NIL rights in the lives of athletes, emphasizing the need for regulatory changes to uphold their rights and opportunities.
Related: College Sports Leaders in Intensive Talks to Settle NIL Antitrust Case Against NCAA
The inclusion of Florida in the lawsuit holds particular significance due to the involvement of prominent universities like Florida State University and the University of Florida in previous NIL-related investigations by the NCAA. Notably, on January 11, the NCAA penalized Florida State University for an incident involving an assistant football coach who facilitated impermissible contact between a transfer prospect and an NIL collective.
With Florida’s participation in the lawsuit, the scope and impact of the legal challenge against the NCAA have expanded considerably. The collaboration among multiple states signals a growing consensus among policymakers and legal authorities regarding the urgency of addressing NIL regulations in collegiate sports.
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand