The Malaysian Competition Commissioin has distinguished between legal and illegal sharing of information within an association. The clarification comes after the Malaysian Automative Association (MAA) was found to have infringed the Competition Act 2010 for sharing information with MAA members. Shila Dorai Raj, MyCC’s chief executive officer, explained that the practice is a violation when information sharing “may be considered as a form of horizontal agreement between competitors” that blocks or distorts competition. The MAA was thus advised that it could share information between its members, but only historical information that is aggregated.
Full content: Bernama
Related content: An Overview of Competition Law in Southeast Asia
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Hits Meta with $37.20 Million Fine Over Data-Sharing Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Google Seeks Dismissal of UK Suit Over Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI