Mylan has dodged claims that it unlawfully shielded its EpiPen from competition by driving Sanofi’s epinephrine auto-injector from the market through exclusive agreements with insurers and pharmacy benefit managers, according to Bloomberg Law.
Judge Daniel D. Crabtree granted summary judgment for Mylan, finding that it didn’t violate antitrust laws by offering rebates to insurers and PBMs that excluded Sanofi’s Auvi-Q from their drug formularies. Exclusive distribution deals are legal as long as they don’t involve threats or coercion, he said.
Sanofi wanted Mylan to pay up to US$11.7 billion in damages for engaging in a scheme to squelch competition to its EpiPen allergy treatment. In particular, Sanofi said Mylan offered rebates to insurers, pharmaceutical benefit managers, and state Medicaid agencies conditioned on Auvi-Q not being an epinephrine auto-injector device they would reimburse for use by consumers.
Featured News
Google Wins Appeal Against EU’s €1.5 Billion Fine for Ad Monopoly Practices
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Introduces Teen Accounts to Address Growing Data Regulation Demands
Sep 17, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Lawyers Wrap Up Arguments to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
Sep 17, 2024 by
CPI
Financial Regulator to Monitor CNMC’s Ruling on BBVA-Sabadell Acquisition
Sep 17, 2024 by
CPI
Green Day Ticket Prices Spark Controversy Amid Dynamic Pricing Concerns
Sep 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández