In a significant development in the ongoing dispute between NASCAR teams and the stock car series, it has been revealed that the teams have enlisted the services of Jeffrey Kessler, a renowned antitrust and sports lawyer. The decision to bring Kessler on board underscores the escalating tensions between the teams and NASCAR regarding a proposed new revenue-sharing model, reported AP.
The announcement of Kessler’s hiring came after a pivotal meeting at Daytona International Speedway, attended by the majority owners of the 15 chartered teams in NASCAR. Despite extending invitations to NASCAR representatives, none were present at the meeting, indicating a growing gulf between the two parties.
The negotiating committee, comprising five team owners, disclosed the hiring of Jeffrey Kessler to The Associated Press on the eve of the rain-postponed Daytona 500. This move follows a breakdown in negotiations between the teams and NASCAR, culminating in the 36 chartered teams opting not to extend their exclusive negotiating window with the sanctioning body.
At the heart of the dispute lies the expiration of the current charter agreement at the end of the season. Two years of discussions between the teams and NASCAR have reached an impasse, exacerbated by NASCAR’s simultaneous negotiations for a lucrative $7.7 billion television rights deal announced in December.
NASCAR’s economic proposal to the teams, which arrived shortly after the TV rights announcement, was met with dissatisfaction due to its lack of flexibility. According to reports, the offer provided no room for the teams to negotiate or counter, further straining relations between the parties.
Jeffrey Kessler, partner and co-executive chair of Winston & Strawn LLP, brings a wealth of experience to the table, particularly in antitrust matters within the realm of professional sports. His involvement signals the teams’ determination to address what they perceive as unfair treatment in the negotiations with NASCAR.
The hiring of Kessler underscores the seriousness of the situation and suggests that the teams are preparing for potential legal action if a resolution cannot be reached through negotiation.
Source: AP News
Featured News
Ribera Calls for Reform in EU Competition Policies
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Urges Second Circuit to Revive Antitrust Lawsuit Against Nexstar
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Omnicom and Interpublic Unite in $13.25B Deal: Big Tech Competition Heats Up
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Ruling Highlights DOJ’s Push Against Algorithmic Collusion in Antitrust Cases
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Judge’s Decision on Kroger-Albertsons Merger Expected Soon
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead