The NCAA and the Southeastern Conference (SEC) have approved a $2.8 billion settlement of antitrust claims, bringing college athletics closer to implementing wide-ranging changes. This settlement addresses three major antitrust lawsuits that have threatened the NCAA with billions in damages.
The SEC, the latest league to agree to the settlement, saw its presidents and chancellors vote unanimously in favor on Thursday, according to sources with direct knowledge of the decision who spoke to The Associated Press under condition of anonymity.
The settlement entails over $2.75 billion in payments from the NCAA to former Division I athletes and introduces a future revenue-sharing model between power-conference schools and athletes. This agreement is outlined by the law firms Hagens Berman and Winston & Strawn LLP, who represent the plaintiffs in the cases House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA.
The revenue-sharing model, which could be implemented as early as next year, is optional for power-conference programs. It would allocate 22 percent of these schools’ average annual revenue, estimated to exceed $20 million per school, directly to athletes.
Read more: NCAA Antitrust Settlement Clears First Approval Stage
The damages, available to Division I athletes dating back to 2016 as compensation for lost name, image, and likeness (NIL) earning opportunities, will be disbursed over ten years.
If a judge approves the settlement, it would mark a significant shift in the NCAA’s longstanding amateur sports model. This model, which has only recently begun to allow athletes to earn endorsement money, would be further disrupted by permitting revenue-sharing between schools and their athletes.
Source: AP News
Featured News
Clifford Chance Expands Global Antitrust Team with New Partner
Dec 6, 2024 by
CPI
Spain’s Financial Regulator Awaits Antitrust Decision on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Suit, Citing Legal Flaws
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief Signals Potential Google Breakup Amid Big Tech Scrutiny
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead