Norway’s competition authority announced on Tuesday that it was extending its regulatory review of the planned sale of Danske Bank’s Norwegian personal customer business to rival bank Nordea. The decision came after the authority expressed concerns that the transaction could potentially harm customers, signaling potential roadblocks for the deal, reported Reuters.
Danske Bank, headquartered in Denmark, had initially disclosed in July its intention to sell its Norwegian personal customer and private banking business to Finland’s Nordea.
The pricing of the acquisition was to be based on “book value” when the deal becomes effective. However, the Norwegian Competition Authority’s preliminary assessment raised red flags about the potential negative impact on Norwegian bank customers.
The regulator stated in a press release, “Our preliminary assessment is that there may be reason to fear that the acquisition will impact Norwegian bank customers negatively. Going forward, the competition authority will more thoroughly consider whether there are reasons to prohibit the acquisition.”
This unexpected move by the authority has raised questions about the future of the transaction and its implications for both Danske Bank and Nordea. Danske Bank, in a response to the development, reaffirmed its expectation that the deal would still be completed by the end of 2024. Nordea also expressed its commitment to the transaction, despite the regulatory uncertainty.
Randi Marjamaa, Chief of Nordea Norway, responded to the competition authority’s decision in a statement, saying, “We take note of the Norwegian Competition Authority’s decision to further review the case and will naturally provide additional information if needed. Our view is that the Norwegian banking sector is characterized by keen competition and that Nordea is a very good solution for the customers in light of Danske Bank’s decision to exit the Norwegian market for personal customers.”
The future of the Danske Bank-Nordea deal remains uncertain, as it now hinges on the competition authority’s comprehensive assessment of the transaction.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand