This article explores the standing of state attorneys general to bring actions to protect the quasi-sovereign interests of their states and citizenries. Known as parens patriae, this form of standing is unique to the sovereign and began as a strictly common law concept, but has been codified in state and federal statutes alike. The article explores the historical development of parens patriae, and the test for determining whether an asserted interest is “quasi-sovereign” as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc., v. Puerto Rico, 458 U.S. 592 (1982). The article concludes by offering some practical suggestions for avoiding the pitfalls that often arise when settlement negotiations – especially those arising out of antitrust cases and investigations – address the issue of parens patriae authority.
Featured News
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Chief Removed as UK Government Targets Regulatory Overhaul
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Court Denies Dismissal in Crab Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok Stays Online for Now: Trump Floats US Ownership Deal
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Hong Kong Watchdog Unveils Compliance Tool for Small Businesses
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan