Robert Kenny, Dec 20, 2012
Plurality rules have long been used to ensure diverse ownership of media, with the expectation that this leads to the availability of diverse news coverage to citizens, which in turn supports democratic discourse. In several countries there is current debate as to whether plurality rules need to be strengthened, and particularly so in the United Kingdom, where News’ bid for Sky and the subsequent phone-hacking scandal have brought plurality issues to the fore. However, fundamental developments in the market mean that the costs of plurality interventions are rising, and the benefits are falling. This paper examines how the costs and benefits of plurality regulation are changing, using the United Kingdom as a case study.
Featured News
Antitrust Suit Against Apple, Visa, and Mastercard Dismissed by Federal Judge
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Google’s Antitrust Woes Mount as Turkey Levels Another Fine
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Australian Competition Commission Approves Lactalis Bid for Fonterra Brands
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Sues California Over Egg Laws, Citing Nationwide Price Hikes
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Blackstone Raises Warehouse REIT Bid to £489M, Topping Rival
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – eDiscovery & Antitrust
Jun 30, 2025 by
CPI
Off-Channel and Ephemeral Messaging in Antitrust Investigations: Legal Risks, Regulatory Focus, and Ediscovery Challenges
Jun 30, 2025 by
Daniel Rupprecht & Tristan Jenkinson
Encrypted Messaging in the Crosshairs: Compliance, Legal Risks, and Global Perspectives
Jun 30, 2025 by
Corey Bieber & Guillermo Christensen
Ephemeral and Encrypted Messaging: DOJ Expectations, Compliance Risks, and Best Practices
Jun 30, 2025 by
Megan Gerking, Joe Folio, Haydn Forrest & Adrienne Irmer
Antitrust Litigation in the Age of GenAI
Jun 30, 2025 by
Robin Perkins & Tom Gricks