Amelia Fletcher, Apr 19, 2007
Over the past few years, there has been a burgeoning literature on two-sided markets and economic understanding of such markets has improved hugely. Less attention has, however, been paid to how competition policy should be applied in two-sided markets. This short note does not attempt to provide a comprehensive analysis of this issue, but merely presents a brief comment on the implications of two-sided market theory for one possible abuse of a dominant position under Article 82 of the EC Treaty: predatory pricing.
Featured News
Paul Weiss Pushes Back Against Removal Bid in Sugar Antitrust Fight
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Saudi Arabia Reviews Uber’s $14.8 Billion Delivery Hero Takeover
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Pope Leo Warns of AI Threats, Calls for Stronger Global Oversight
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Settlement Faces Coalition Challenge
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
New York Grocery Plan Puts Predatory-Pricing Rules to the Test
Sep 24, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton