This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Jonathan Zuck, Nov 25, 2009
In a recent speech, Neelie Kroes of the European Commission argued that “as enforcers we do have ” special responsibility to ensure a fair and transparent process. But the great weight of evidence says we meet this responsibility. While the Commission clearly has made some efforts to meet its “special responsibility,” there is also evidence to suggest more can and should be done. The Commission has made important changes to its procedures over the years, but it still has a way to go to create full confidence in its procedural fairness.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Opens Antitrust Probe of Google’s AI Partnership with Character.AI
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros