Proposed Antitrust Legislation Threatens To Harm US Tech Startups And The Innovation Economy
By Ike Brannon, Forbes
The recently-released GDP estimates revealed that the economy contracted for the second quarter in a row, and some economists fear that we may already be in a recession. Given the precarious nature of the economy, recently proposed legislation intended to throttle the “Big Tech” companies seems singularly ill-timed, given that the bill would almost surely make life harder for tech startups and otherwise harm the innovation economy.
The head of the Federal Trade Commission, Lina Khan, has embraced a neo-Brandeisian antitrust model that eschews the notion that a merger, a market, or the size of a firm be judged solely on its impact on prices and consumer welfare. In its place is a determination to constrain big companies simply because being big is, in itself, harmful. This alternative economic approach has its adherents in Congress as well: for instance, Senator Amy Klobucher’s S. 2992, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act would essentially enact Khan’s agenda and damage the U.S. economy.
Featured News
Woolworths Calls On ACCC To Conduct a “Fact-Based” Inquiry into Supermarket Competition
May 22, 2024 by
CPI
EU Chips Act Set to Attract Over €100 Billion in Private Investment by 2030
May 22, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Antitrust Regulator Approves New Terms for Petrobras Agreement
May 22, 2024 by
CPI
Apple Challenges €1.84 Billion EU Fine Over App Store Restrictions
May 22, 2024 by
CPI
SEC Urges Lawmakers to Reject New Crypto Bill, Citing Market Risks
May 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI