A group of 11 distinguished nonfiction authors, including Pulitzer Prize winners Taylor Branch, Stacy Schiff, and Kai Bird, has united in a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing the tech giants of violating copyright laws by improperly using their written works to train artificial intelligence (AI) models, including OpenAI’s renowned ChatGPT.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, claims that OpenAI and Microsoft unlawfully employed the authors’ books to train GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language models, such as the widely-used ChatGPT and other AI-based software.
Julian Sancton, a writer and editor at Hollywood Reporter, initiated the proposed class-action lawsuit last month, and it is one of several cases brought by various copyright owners, including authors John Grisham, George R.R. Martin, and Jonathan Franzen, against OpenAI and other technology companies for alleged misuse of their intellectual property in AI training.
Notably, this lawsuit marks the first time that Microsoft has been named as a defendant alongside OpenAI in an author’s legal action. Microsoft, a major investor in OpenAI, has invested billions in the AI startup and incorporated its systems into its suite of products. Both OpenAI and Microsoft have refuted the allegations.
Read more: FTC Investigating OpenAI Over Data Security
According to the amended complaint filed on Monday, the authors assert that OpenAI “scraped” their works, along with a substantial amount of other copyrighted material from the internet, without obtaining proper authorization.
According to Reuters, his material was allegedly used to instruct GPT models on how to generate responses to human text prompts. The lawsuit contends that Microsoft played a significant role in the training and development of these models and is, therefore, equally accountable for copyright infringement.
In their legal filing, the authors are seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction to prohibit the companies from further infringing on their copyrights. The lawsuit adds to the growing legal scrutiny faced by tech companies over the use of copyrighted material in training AI models, raising questions about the ethical and legal boundaries in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
European Music Streaming Firms Rally Against Apple’s Proposed Remedies
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI