In the volatile landscape of residential real estate, one of the industry’s giants, Zillow, finds itself in the crosshairs of short seller Spruce Point Capital. The investment firm has taken a bearish stance on Zillow’s stock, predicting a potential plummet of 40 to 60 percent in the long term, as reported by Bloomberg.
Spruce Point Capital’s skepticism revolves around Zillow’s reliance on selling marketing services to real estate agents. The firm suggests that this business model could face significant threats amid the tumultuous changes rocking the residential real estate industry due to ongoing antitrust lawsuits.
According to Spruce Point, the wave of legal action from antitrust commissions poses a “dramatic” risk to Zillow’s operations. The company’s chief executive officer, Rich Barton, has attempted to assuage concerns by highlighting Zillow’s substantial audience, presenting it as a buffer against worst-case scenarios resulting from changes in commission rules. Barton even floated the possibility of a “pay-to-play” model akin to digital listing marketplaces in international markets if lawsuits eliminate buyer’s agents entirely. However, Spruce Point remains steadfast in its assertion that Zillow’s exposure to antitrust litigation remains a pressing issue.
Read more: Zillow Faces Private Antitrust Suit
Moreover, Spruce Point points to increased competition from CoStar Group’s Homes.com, which is aggressively marketing its residential products. It dismisses Zillow’s recent efforts to establish itself as a “super app” as a mere ploy to impress investors.
Zillow’s stock mirrored the uncertainty surrounding the company, experiencing a tumultuous trading day. Opening at $56 on Tuesday, the stock took a significant dip throughout the day before staging a late recovery, ultimately closing at $54.49, marking a 2.7 percent decline for the day. Despite this, Zillow’s stock has shown resilience over the past year, surging by more than 27 percent, outperforming many benchmarks in the housing market.
As Zillow navigates through these challenging waters, investors and industry observers keenly await how the company will address the mounting antitrust pressures and fierce competition, and whether its current strategies will suffice in safeguarding its market position.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand