Having already detailed its reasons for handing Korg UK a £1.5 million (US$1.9 million) fine in relation to price fixing, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has now explained why it fined Roland UK £4 million (US$5.09 million) for similar offences.
The CMA stated, “Between 7 January 2011 and 17 April 2018, Roland set minimum prices for its electronic drum kits, related components and accessories and told resellers not to sell below these prices.
“It used price-monitoring software to police the minimum pricing policy. This software monitored online prices to make sure resellers were selling at or above the prices Roland specified.
“In order to make sure that resellers kept to these prices, Roland threatened (and sometimes applied) sanctions against those who advertised and sold at lower prices. For example, Roland removed key discounts off the trade price for certain resellers.”
The report goes on to state that many resellers knew that Roland’s pricing policy meant that they may be in breach of competition law, and reported on each other when a price dropped below Roland’s minimum price. What’s more, it was made clear that some of Roland’s senior employees knew that what they were doing was wrong.
It stated, “One senior Roland employee noted in an internal email that they had to be very careful about talking to resellers about resale prices as Roland could be leaving itself ‘wide open for an investigation by the competition authorities’ stating that they were ‘not copying this message more widely – it is too dangerous due to the sensitive content.’
“Despite knowing what they were doing was wrong, Roland continued to enforce RPM, and took various measures to hide its wrongdoing. For example, Roland staff at times avoided creating written records and stated in an internal document: ‘Admin – Reiterate – Delete all Text messages/emails. No more emails re price.’ and communicated this policy to resellers either orally or through ‘code’. Also, on occasions, Roland staff deleted written communications about this policy.”
Roland’s fine was increased because senior management were involved, and because the illegal behavior was intentional. It was reduced because Roland admitted to breaking the law and cooperated with the CMA’s investigation.
Full Content: Gov UK
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google Faces DOJ Antitrust Trial, Publishers Watch Closely for Impact on Ad Market
Sep 9, 2024 by
CPI
India Moves to Challenge Big Tech Power in Digital Markets
Sep 9, 2024 by
CPI
US Tightens Grip on AI: New Reporting Rules for Developers and Cloud Providers
Sep 9, 2024 by
CPI
EU Court to Decide Apple’s €13bn Tax Battle
Sep 9, 2024 by
CPI
Google Lawyer Kevin Yingling Joins Freshfields Amid Antitrust Fight
Sep 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI