A case filed with the Federal Antimonopoly Service between two cement companies has been rejected by the regulator, stating that no antitrust violations have been made. BaselCement-Pikalyovo filed a claim against Pikalyvsky Cement accusing the competitor of breaking law after Pikalyvsky revoked its order for raw materials despite the fact that it is the sole customer for BaselCement. According to BaselCement, the retraction of the order threatened to cease cement production; the company halted operations in 2009 due to a raw material shortage in a situation resolved by a supplies treaty. The FAS declined to hear the case, however.
Featured News
South Korean Law Firm Lee & Ko Adds Antitrust Partner Min-Ho Lee
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Nominates Business Executive and GOP Donor to FTC
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
OSTP Official Lays Out Details on White House AI Initiatives At House Hearing
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk Accused of Blocking Access to Lower-Cost Weight-Loss Drugs
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Visa, Mastercard and Revolut Fail to Block UK Fee Cap Proposal
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi