New screening guidelines for abuse of dominance by online platforms have been implemented in South Korea.
In a statement, the Korea Fair Trade Commission, or KFTC, said the platform-specific guidelines that define the screening criteria for dominance abuse stipulated in competition law have been finalized.
The authorities will also revise antitrust laws to tighten decision-making processes on merger and acquisition reviews in a bid to put the brakes on local platform operators’ business expansion.
Read more: South Korean Watchdog Refers K Cube Holdings To Prosecution
Other unfair trade practices in app stores, including the compulsory in-app payment systems, will be subject to the government’s strict monitoring plan, the government added.
The plan also requires local platform operators, like Naver and Kakao, to build separate backup data centers to prevent service disruptions in case of disaster such as fire.
The move came as the South Korean government has vowed to come up with measures to lay the groundwork for fair competition in the online platform market after the nationwide service outage caused by a fire at a Kakao data center in October.
Kakao’s dominant chat messenger KakaoTalk, which has 43 million users in a country with a population of 51 million, was affected by the fire, leading to a massive disruption in services tied to the app, ranging from social networking and business to finance and transportation.
Featured News
Crypto.com Sues SEC, Alleging Regulatory Overreach in Crypto Industry
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Elite US Universities Face New Antitrust Suit Over Financial Aid Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Kirkland & Ellis Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner from FTC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
TikTok Hit with Lawsuits from 13 US States and DC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Merck Wins Antitrust Immunity in Mumps Vaccine Case, U.S. Court Rules
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh