Computer scientist Stephen Thaler petitioned the US Supreme Court on Friday to hear his case concerning the international patenting of inventions created by his artificial intelligence. Thaler has been actively seeking recognition for his AI-generated innovations through patents around the world.
Thaler requested the Supreme Court to review a ruling by the appeals court that patents may only be granted to human inventors and thus, his AI system does not qualify as the legal creator of inventions it generated.
Thaler said in his brief that AI is being used to innovate in fields ranging from medicine to energy, and that rejecting AI-generated patents “curtails our patent system’s ability — and thwarts Congress’s intent — to optimally stimulate innovation and technological progress.”
Read more: Principles of Digital Law and Ethics
Thaler’s DABUS system, which stands for Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience, created two original prototypes: a beverage holder and a light beacon. However, the US Patent and Trademark Office, as well as a Virginia federal court rejected patent applications for these inventions based on the legal precedent that only human beings are eligible to receive patents. This judgment was further secured by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last year.
Thaler told the high court that the law should not be read to require a human inventor.
“Nowhere in the text of the Patent Act has Congress restricted the term ‘inventor’ — or the word ‘individual’ within its definition — solely to natural persons,” Thaler’s petition said.
Featured News
UK’s CMA Investigates Education Software Company for Market Abuse
May 14, 2024 by
CPI
Schumer Urges FTC Caution on Chevron’s $53B Hess Deal Over Gas Price Fears
May 14, 2024 by
CPI
Amazon Urges US Judge to Block FTC Probe into Data Preservation
May 14, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Makes History: First State to Enact Comprehensive AI Legislation
May 14, 2024 by
CPI
Class Action Settlement Reached in Cheerleading Monopoly
May 14, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI