The U.S. Supreme Court has sought the Biden administration’s input on whether it should entertain the U.S. Soccer Federation’s plea to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of colluding with FIFA to prohibit foreign teams from playing official matches in the United States. The case, brought by New York-based Relevent Sports in 2019, alleges that the ban violates American antitrust laws.
Relevent Sports’ lawsuit targets both U.S. Soccer and FIFA, asserting that the ban infringes on antitrust regulations, and it aims to halt the implementation of such a prohibition. While U.S. Soccer is a member of FIFA, it contends that it played no role in formulating FIFA’s 2018 policy that prevents foreign clubs from conducting competitive matches outside their home countries, per Reuters.
Read more: EU Football Agents Callout FIFA For “Cartel Activity”
The dispute reached the Supreme Court after a federal judge dismissed Relevent’s suit in 2021. However, the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case in March of this year. The appellate court ruled that U.S. Soccer could be held accountable if FIFA’s rule is found to violate antitrust laws, emphasizing that U.S. Soccer, as a FIFA member, agreed to abide by the international body’s rules.
According to Reuters, the outcome of this legal battle has potential ramifications for the landscape of international soccer in the United States. Currently, the U.S. hosts “friendly” matches involving foreign professional teams, but a favorable ruling for Relevent Sports could pave the way for hosting more significant matches, involving prominent professional clubs and players from around the world.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of U.S. Soccer’s appeal reflects the ongoing challenge in U.S. courts to determine how antitrust laws apply to members of organizations or associations based on shared rules and memberships.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI