
By:
On January 10, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an order granting approval for the applications of 11 spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products (the “Approved ETPs”) to list and trade their shares on a national securities exchange.[1] Consequently, each Approved ETP is slated to commence trading on either the NYSE Arca, Inc., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. This SEC Order marks the first instance where the SEC has authorized the listing of an exchange-traded product (“ETP”) directly investing in a cryptocurrency, specifically Bitcoin (“spot crypto ETPs”).
Background
The order signifies a significant milestone for both asset managers and the crypto industry. Prior to the SEC Order, the only cryptocurrency-related ETPs permitted by the SEC for trading on national securities exchanges were those primarily investing in cryptocurrency-derived futures (“crypto futures ETPs”), rather than cryptocurrencies acquired directly from the spot market. Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) faced similar limitations.[2]
In rejecting previous listing applications for spot crypto ETPs, the SEC cited concerns regarding whether the rules of the exchanges where such ETPs were proposed to be listed were adequately designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative activities, as mandated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Spot crypto ETPs sought to address this requirement by claiming that the exchange in question maintained a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a “regulated market of significant size” related to the underlying cryptocurrency assets, typically referring to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s (“CME”) Bitcoin futures market for spot Bitcoin ETPs. The SEC dismissed these assertions, stating that applicants failed to demonstrate that the CME met the criteria of being a regulated market of sufficient size for these purposes, known as the “significant market test.”
Featured News
9th Circuit Revives Privacy Lawsuit Against Shopify Over Data Tracking
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Warns Google Could Use AI Tools to Extend Search Monopoly As Antitrust Remedies Trial Begins
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Uber Faces Regulatory Heat as FTC Targets Subscription Practices
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Declines to Hear CSX Antitrust Case Against Norfolk Southern
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Proposed Antitrust Law Could Cost NY Billions, Says Business Council
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickinson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece