A PYMNTS Company

SEP-13(2)

BY | December 22, 2015

Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court finally tackled Reverse Payments. In Actavis, they leaned away from many lower court decisions and acknowledged that reverse payments (or “pay for delay”) can…

Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court finally tackled Reverse Payments. In Actavis, they leaned away from many lower court decisions and acknowledged that reverse payments (or “pay for delay”) can create antitrust violations. But they didn’t give the FTC—who has waged war on the concept for several years—carte blanche. Our distinguished panel has had time to reflect on this decision and studies what it means for reverse payments going forward—and how the decision also impac

...
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 3.227.240.72

Please verify email or join us to access premium content!