Pacific Seafood and West Coast fishermen have reached a settlement to resolve allegations brought in a class action lawsuit. The plaintiff class claimed that Pacific, the U.S.’s largest seafood buyer, fixed the prices of seafood by using its market power as both a processor and distributor. The plaintiffs’ attorneys sought $74-120 million in damages, as well as an order to have Pacific sell its processing assets.
The terms of the proposed settlement now call for no monetary damages. Instead, Pacific is to embark upon pro-competitive measures such as increasing transparency of seafood wholesale prices and accepting fish scrap from new processors. The settlement is awaiting approval by U.S. District Judge Owen Panner.
Full content: Oregon Live
Related content: Antitrust Class Actions After Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes (William Monts III, Hogan Lovells)
Featured News
US Firefighters’ Union Urges Antitrust Probe Into Fire Truck Industry
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senators Urge FCC to Modernize Broadcast Ownership Rules Amid Digital Disruption
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Regulators Probe SES-Intelsat Deal, Seek Insight on Starlink’s Competitive Threat
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Removes Copyright and Library of Congress Leaders After AI Policy Rift
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Delta, Korean Air Buy Into WestJet in Major Cross-Border Deal
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece