The Competition Commission of Singapore has decided to reduce fines issued to five of 11 modeling agencies based in the country who were found to have colluded to fix prices in 2011. The five whose fines will be reduced had appealed their penalizations after the Commission found that the agencies had collectively raised the rates of modeling services. But the agencies argued their pricing policies followed the guidelines of the Association of Modeling Industry Professionals. The Commission found that association to be a “front” for the price-fixing, and eventually found that the pricing practices negatively affected customers including publishers, photographers and fashion labels. The regulator first launched an investigation in 2009.
Featured News
Bayer Changes Seed Program After DOJ Raised Unfair Competition Concerns
May 20, 2026 by
CPI
Second Circuit Backs MLS, US Soccer in Antitrust Appeal
May 20, 2026 by
CPI
India’s Competition Regulator Warns of AI-Driven Market Risks
May 20, 2026 by
CPI
Health Tech Investors Are Done Paying for Promises
May 20, 2026 by
CPI
AI Is Giving Government Contractors a New Way to Stay Ahead of the Rules
May 20, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos