Singapore’s competition watchdog, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS), revealed on Monday that it had initiated an inquiry into the collapsed discussions between Grab Holdings and Delivery Hero, expressing concerns over potential ramifications for competition within the food delivery sector.
Reports from September had indicated that Germany’s Delivery Hero was exploring options to offload its foodpanda business in select Southeast Asian markets, with Singapore-based Grab emerging as a potential suitor, according to Reuters.
The investigation by the CCCS commenced in early January, prompted by fears that a merger or acquisition between Grab and Delivery Hero’s foodpanda could further consolidate control over Singapore’s lucrative food delivery market. A report by research firm Momentum Works suggested that Grab and foodpanda collectively held a commanding 91% share of the $2.5 billion market, with Grab alone claiming 63%.
Related: Abandoned Grab-Delivery Hero Deal Got Attention of Singapore Regulator
However, the regulatory scrutiny came to an end on Feb. 23, following Delivery Hero’s decision to abandon plans for a potential sale and Grab’s assertion that it was no longer pursuing any such deal, as reported by Reuters. Media accounts indicate that the talks between the two companies collapsed in early February.
The CCCS’s intervention underscores the growing regulatory focus on competition within the tech-driven food delivery industry. As platforms like Grab and foodpanda continue to dominate markets globally, regulators are increasingly vigilant about preventing monopolistic practices that could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
While the failed negotiations have alleviated immediate concerns about market consolidation, the incident has drawn attention to the need for ongoing scrutiny and regulation in the rapidly evolving food delivery landscape.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Chief Removed as UK Government Targets Regulatory Overhaul
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Court Denies Dismissal in Crab Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok Stays Online for Now: Trump Floats US Ownership Deal
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Hong Kong Watchdog Unveils Compliance Tool for Small Businesses
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan