According to reports, South Africa’s Competition Appeal Court prefers a “narrow” interpretation of the Competition Tribunal’s powers. The issue at hand concerns the Competition Act and its lack of clarity, as it does not specify exact powers and their limits attributed to the Tribunal. Analysts believe that the Competition Appeal Court’s recent decision – the Loungefoam decision – exemplifies a “narrower interpretation” of the Tribunal’s powers, arguing that the Tribunal does not have the power to decide on complaints that are not referred directly to it. The Competition Commission’s annual report for 2011 and 2012 highlighted this issue, quoting commissioner Shan Ramburuth as saying that there are “different visions” for the role and scope of the nation’s competition law.
Featured News
House Votes to Pass CLARITY Act After Drama Threatened to Derail Crypto Market Structure Bill
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Zillow Rejects Compass’s Antitrust Claims Amid Listing Policy Dispute
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Probes ServiceNow’s $2.85B AI Merger with Moveworks
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Authors Can Sue Anthropic Over Alleged AI Book Piracy, Judge Rules
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Charter, Cox Request FCC Green Light for $34.5B Merger
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
CPI
Should We Fear Personalized Pricing?
Jul 14, 2025 by
John Yun
Data and Price Competition: The Special Role of Information About Rivals’ Prices
Jul 14, 2025 by
Zach Y. Brown & Alexander MacKay
Surveillance Pricing: A Cautionary Summary of Potential Harms and Solutions
Jul 14, 2025 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
The Rise of Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
Rebecca Kirk Fair, Alvaro Ziadi & Juan Carvajal