According to reports, South Africa’s Competition Appeal Court prefers a “narrow” interpretation of the Competition Tribunal’s powers. The issue at hand concerns the Competition Act and its lack of clarity, as it does not specify exact powers and their limits attributed to the Tribunal. Analysts believe that the Competition Appeal Court’s recent decision – the Loungefoam decision – exemplifies a “narrower interpretation” of the Tribunal’s powers, arguing that the Tribunal does not have the power to decide on complaints that are not referred directly to it. The Competition Commission’s annual report for 2011 and 2012 highlighted this issue, quoting commissioner Shan Ramburuth as saying that there are “different visions” for the role and scope of the nation’s competition law.
Featured News
Live Nation Pushes Back on States’ Renewed Bid for DOJ Settlement Records
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
California Subpoenas OpenAI as Scrutiny of AI Cybersecurity Risks Grows
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Faces Antitrust Suit Over $650 Million Casetext Acquisition
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Sandoz Agrees to $400 Million Deal to Resolve States’ Generic-Drug Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon e-Book Buyers Move Closer to Class Certification in Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton