According to reports, South Africa’s Competition Appeal Court prefers a “narrow” interpretation of the Competition Tribunal’s powers. The issue at hand concerns the Competition Act and its lack of clarity, as it does not specify exact powers and their limits attributed to the Tribunal. Analysts believe that the Competition Appeal Court’s recent decision – the Loungefoam decision – exemplifies a “narrower interpretation” of the Tribunal’s powers, arguing that the Tribunal does not have the power to decide on complaints that are not referred directly to it. The Competition Commission’s annual report for 2011 and 2012 highlighted this issue, quoting commissioner Shan Ramburuth as saying that there are “different visions” for the role and scope of the nation’s competition law.
Full Content: Biz Community
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI