A PYMNTS Company

South Africa: Concessions on food merger leave bad taste in parties’ mouths

By  |  November 11, 2013
South Africa: Concessions on food merger leave bad taste in parties’ mouths

South Africa’s Competition Commission is reportedly being challenged by the merging parties Foodcorp and Oceana, which have stated they disagree with the concessions ordered to gain clearance for the merger.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    According to reports, Oceana acquired Foodcorp’s fishing operations, but the Commission ordered that Foodcorp had to divest one brand name and a fish quota allocated by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

    While the parties said they were aware of the need to sell the name brand, known as Glenryck, but disagreed with the order to divest the fishing quota, which they say was introduced as a condition in the final stages of the merger process.

    According to reports, the companies will now appeal the decision to the Competition Tribunal.

    Full Content: BDLive

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.