South Africa: Concessions on food merger leave bad taste in parties’ mouths
South Africa’s Competition Commission is reportedly being challenged by the merging parties Foodcorp and Oceana, which have stated they disagree with the concessions ordered to gain clearance for the merger.
According to reports, Oceana acquired Foodcorp’s fishing operations, but the Commission ordered that Foodcorp had to divest one brand name and a fish quota allocated by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
While the parties said they were aware of the need to sell the name brand, known as Glenryck, but disagreed with the order to divest the fishing quota, which they say was introduced as a condition in the final stages of the merger process.
According to reports, the companies will now appeal the decision to the Competition Tribunal.
Full Content: BDLive
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI