Testimony offered by economic expert Stephan Malherbe, who stood witness for South African Breweries, said that SAB is not legally obliged to outsource its business activities in the case heard before the Competition Tribunal last Monday. The Competition Commission is looking to require SAB to nix its exclusivity clauses that appoint distributors for its products. But Malherbe said South African competition law does not require companies to outsource such practices, and that the “rule of reason” approach should be used in this case, with the complainant holding the burden of proof. Further, the witness said, blocking the exclusivity agreements would not necessarily lead to increased competition or lowered prices. But the Commission says an investigation into SAB found anticompetitive effects on the beverages market, and that the exclusivity agreements lead to price-fixing and market allocation. The probe was launched following a complaint issued in 2004.
Featured News
CMA Initiates Market Study on UK Road and Railway Infrastructure Delivery
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Opens Antitrust Investigation into Google Over Digital Advertising Practices
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Florida Legislature Pushes for Tougher Noncompete Restrictions
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Apple Explores Potential Acquisition of AI Startup Perplexity AI
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
New York City Sets New Minimum Pay Standards for Rideshare Drivers
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides