A PYMNTS Company

Springer India abused its dominance in academic journal market

By  |  July 5, 2012

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has fined Springer India for abuse of dominance in the market for academic journals. CCI investigated the publisher following a complaint filed by Prints Media alleging unfair practices. The probe uncovered an agreement between Springer India and India Academy of Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Sciences, Indian National Science Academy, Operational Research Society of India, the Department of Psychology at the University of Delhi, Indian Statistical Institute, Association of Food Scientist and Technologist, and IGCAR Kalpakkam.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    CCI found that Springer’s dominance came about not through market share, but through the 47 journals deemed “must-have” titles for researches to which Springer had rights. Springer was found to have imposed unfair prices and conditions. It also banned experts for writing for other publications.

    Full content: The Hindu Business Line

     

    Related content: Some Economics of Abuse of Dominance

     

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.