This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
FTC Reaches Record $4.5 Million Settlement With 7-Eleven
Dec 10, 2025 by
CPI
Google Faces Antitrust Scrutiny Over AI Overviews and News Content
Dec 9, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Competition Case Focusing on IQVIA’s Business Practices
Dec 9, 2025 by
CPI
Paramount Bid for Warner Bros. Draws Warren’s Antitrust Warning
Dec 9, 2025 by
CPI
CFTC Launches Pilot Program For Use of Digital Assets as Collateral in Derivatives Markets
Dec 9, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Intellectual Property
Nov 19, 2025 by
CPI
Dealing in Intellectual Property: IP Justifications and Defenses in Digital Markets Cases
Nov 19, 2025 by
Jennifer Dixton
The Evolving Role of Innovation Theories of Harm in the Antitrust Analysis of Life Science Mergers
Nov 19, 2025 by
Michelle Yost Hale, Matthew D. McDonald & Merrill Stovroff
Who Can Fix It? Antitrust, IP Rights, and the Right to Repair
Nov 19, 2025 by
Rosa M. Morales
Copyright, Antitrust, and the Politics of Generative AI
Nov 19, 2025 by
Daryl Lim