
The operator of Kinney Drugs retail chain sued Takeda Pharmaceutical and Endo International over claims that the pharmaceutical manufacturers allegedly engaged in a pay-to-delay scheme to keep generic versions of Takeda’s anti-constipation drug Amitiza off the market.
Related: Takeda Wants 2nd Circuit To Toss Actos Antitrust Suit
KPH Healthcare Services’ antitrust lawsuit, filed Tuesday, August 3, in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, claimed that Japan-based Takeda and its US subsidiary, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, made “reverse payments” totaling between US$29 and US$280 million to an Endo subsidiary, Par Pharmaceuticals, to keep the generic from being introduced for over six years.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Withdraws Case Against Microsoft-Activision Merger, Citing Public Interest
May 23, 2025 by
CPI
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros