A PYMNTS Company

Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible?

By  |  November 12, 2015

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible? Robert Comment (Independent)

    Abstract: The dozen largest private equity firms are accused of bid-rigging in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market due to the practice of team bidding in groups known as clubs or consortia. The antitrust allegations are implausible, however, because the segments of the M&A market dominated by private equity firms are among the most competitive of all, sale processes are run by disinterested directors who’s permission generally is required before prospective buyers can team up, and the differential average offer premium paid by teams of private equity sponsors is zero.