A PYMNTS Company

Tesla Verdict Sparks Calls for Stricter Oversight of Autopilot Technology

By  |  August 5, 2025

Tesla’s ambitions to expand its self-driving vehicle network may face fresh hurdles after a Florida jury ordered the electric carmaker to pay roughly $243 million in damages over a fatal crash involving its Autopilot system, according to Reuters.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The verdict, delivered last week, stems from a 2019 collision in which a Model S equipped with the driver-assistance software was involved in a deadly accident. Jurors found the technology defective, per Reuters, while Tesla argued the driver bore sole responsibility and pledged to appeal the decision.

    The ruling lands at a critical juncture for CEO Elon Musk, who has been pushing to gain regulatory approval to roll out a fleet of robotaxis across the United States. Legal experts told Reuters the decision could strengthen calls for tighter oversight of autonomous driving systems, potentially slowing the timeline for such services.

    “The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, ‘We just can’t let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence,’” said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and a specialist in mobility-sector litigation.

    Tesla’s robotaxi initiative is a key piece of Musk’s broader strategy, especially as global competition in the EV market intensifies and sales of the company’s older vehicle models soften. Much of Tesla’s high market valuation depends on the success of its robotics and artificial intelligence ventures, according to Reuters.

    Related: Tesla Strikes $16.5 Billion Chip Deal with Samsung to Boost AI Chip Production

    Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman, noted that the timing of the court decision was especially damaging for Tesla. “Now there’s essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla’s business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn’t what it’s cracked up to be,” he said.

    Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software—an advanced version of Autopilot—is the foundation of its planned robotaxi fleet. While Autopilot handles tasks such as highway lane centering and adaptive speed control, FSD can operate on city streets, enabling automatic turns and lane changes.

    Piper Sandler analysts said the outcome of the Florida trial does not directly affect the company’s FSD rollout, given that the software has been significantly updated since the 2019 incident.

    A Tesla spokesperson confirmed to Reuters that the company had received a request for comment on the matter but had not issued a statement by the time of publication.

    Source: Reuters