Yong Huang and Xin Zhang, March 20, 2016
On March 20, 2013, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province gave its judgment on the case of abuse of market dominance of Beijing Qihoo Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qihoo”) vs. Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (collectively referred to as “Tencent”) and dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims. On October 8, 2014, the Supreme People’s Court made a second trial on the case and held that in the first instance judgment the facts ascertained were basically true, the application of law was correct and the trial result was appropriate, thereby it judged to reject the appeal and maintained the original verdict.
Featured News
NY Laws Requires Disclosure of AI Actors in Ads, Limit Use of Person’s Image After Death
Dec 12, 2025 by
CPI
Three More States to Throw the Switch on Comprehensive Privacy Rules in 2026.
Dec 12, 2025 by
CPI
Dozens of State AGs Demand AI Companies Fix ‘Delusion’ Outputs by Chatbots
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Texas Sues Epic Systems, Accusing Health-Tech Giant of Anticompetitive Data Practices
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Court Affirms Apple Injunction but Trims Limits in Epic Dispute
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Acqui-hiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Anticompetitive Effects of Acquihires: Labor and Product Markets
Dec 11, 2025 by
Heski Bar-Isaac, Justin Johnson & Volker Nocke
Acquihires In the Technology Sector: Antitrust Scrutiny Through the Lens of Economics
Dec 11, 2025 by
Juliette Caminade, Rebecca Kirk Fair, Zsolt Udvari & Jeanne Vellard Smith
M&A in the AI Era: Considerations for Acquihiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre, Kenneth Schwartz, Christopher Barlow, Page Griffin, Michael Cardella, Stuart Levi, Taylor Votek, Benjamin Salzer, Lisa G. Liu & Liz Kraus
Lock Them Up, or Take No Prisoners? Merger Policy and Acquiring AI Talent: Human Rights and Other Inconvenient Facts
Dec 11, 2025 by
Simon R. Pritchard