Jean Tirole, Apr 01, 2005
This primer analyzes factors that make ties more likely either to hurt or to benefit consumers. It first identifies factors that influence where the impact of tying on competition in the tied market stands, ranging from little impact on the rivals’ ability to compete to total exclusion of competitors. Then, after reviewing anticompetitive and efficiency-enhancing motives for tying, it argues that tying should be submitted to a rule of reason standard. Furthermore, tying should not be a distinct offense but considered as one possible mechanism of predation. Like many other corporate strategies that make one’s products attractive to consumers, tying has the potential of hurting competitors, and, therefore, is just one in a large range of strategies that can be employed to prey on them. Finally, the primer discusses the costs and benefits of adopting a predation-based standard.
Featured News
Meta Ordered to Grant Rival AI Chatbots Free WhatsApp Access During EU Antitrust Probe
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Former DOJ Antitrust Leaders Criticize Live Nation Settlement After Trial’s Abrupt End
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Musicians Union Takes Warner and Universal to Court Over AI Training Rights
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Massachusetts Lawmakers Unanimously Pass Comprehensive Privacy Protections
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Nuvei Nears $2.7 Billion Deal to Acquire Payoneer, Sources Say
Jun 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani