Joseph Farrell, Michael Katz, Nov 01, 2006
There has been considerable debate concerning whether consumer surplus or total surplus should be the welfare standard for antitrust. This debate misses two critical issues. First, antitrust is not straightforwardly welfarist. It does not maximize but protects, and it does not forbid all actions that seem likely to lower some welfare measure. Second, the enforcement process involves multiple steps and multiple decision makers. The authors conclude that, while some popular arguments for a consumer surplus standard are weak, other arguments have some merit.
Featured News
Mamdani Taps Former FTC Chair Lina Khan for Key New York Economic Development Role
Jul 22, 2026 by
CPI
EU Approves Paramount’s Warner Bros. Acquisition After Distribution Concessions
Jul 22, 2026 by
CPI
European Regulators Scrutinize $20 Billion Offshore Engineering Tie-Up
Jul 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Faces Record Antitrust Case as KFTC Weighs $7.7 Billion Bond-Market Penalties
Jul 22, 2026 by
CPI
TikTok US Security Chief to Testify Before House Panel on China Concerns
Jul 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes