Joseph Farrell, Michael Katz, Nov 01, 2006
There has been considerable debate concerning whether consumer surplus or total surplus should be the welfare standard for antitrust. This debate misses two critical issues. First, antitrust is not straightforwardly welfarist. It does not maximize but protects, and it does not forbid all actions that seem likely to lower some welfare measure. Second, the enforcement process involves multiple steps and multiple decision makers. The authors conclude that, while some popular arguments for a consumer surplus standard are weak, other arguments have some merit.
Featured News
Acima Reaches Deal With 43 States Over Consumer Leasing Practices
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Michigan Takes Aim at Mackinac Island Ferry Monopoly in Antitrust Fight
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Farmers Union Blames Corporate Consolidation for Rising Grocery Costs
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Weighs Bank-Controlled Stablecoin Rules as Fintech Firms Push Back
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Closes Antitrust Probe Into Dutch Rail Operator NS
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data Portability
Nov 12, 2026 by
CPI
Mandating Access to a Dominant Platform’s Inferred Data: A Two Scenario Diagnosis
Nov 12, 2026 by
Sean Ennis
Data Portability Between Individual Control and Data Sharing at Scale
Nov 12, 2026 by
Jasper van den Boom & Inge Graef
Information Also Wants to Be Expensive: Data Portability and the Open-Systems Creed
Nov 12, 2026 by
Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
Data Portability’s Cybersecurity Paradox: When Protecting Consumer Data Restricts Competition
Nov 12, 2026 by
Sasha Hondagneu-Messner