The German FCO’s Facebook Case: Blurring The Line Between Competition And Data Protection Enforcement
By Jakob Kucharczyk, Project DisCo
This week Germany’s Bundeskartellamt, the Federal Cartel Office (FCO), made the news by issuing a decision against Facebook for the alleged abuse of market power “based on the extent of collecting, using and merging data in a user account”. In concrete terms, the FCO takes issue with Facebook merging user data from Facebook-owned properties like WhatsApp and Instagram as well as from third-party websites with a person’s Facebook user account. It ordered Facebook to stop that practice unless users give Facebook their “voluntary consent”. The FCO considers the combining of Facebook data with ‘non-Facebook’ data an exploitative abuse because users have to agree to what FCO President Andreas Mundt refers to as a “practically unrestricted collection” of non-Facebook data if they want to use the service.
This case is set to raise many questions in the competition community but certainly the most striking aspect of the decision is that it is entirely based on an alleged infringement of European data protection rules enshrined in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The FCO states that Facebook’s “terms of service and the manner and extent to which it collects and uses data are in violation of the European data protection rules”. It is remarkable for a competition authority to determine whether there was a breach of data protection rules given that there are specialized agencies tasked with making precisely that call. Making that call in the context of a competition investigation is equal to saying that because a company is dominant it is more likely to use its market power to impose terms and conditions on its users that are in breach of data protection rules.
Featured News
On Witness Stand, Google CEO Challenges DOJ’s Proposed Remedies In Search Monopoly Case
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Latham & Watkins Expands German Antitrust Practice
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
DoorDash, Grubhub, and Uber Eats Settle With NYC Over Cap Fees
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Pork Giants Push to Overturn Price-Fixing Suit Citing Clerk’s Alleged Conflicts
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Novartis to Acquire Regulus Therapeutics in $1.7 Billion Deal
Apr 30, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece