The Italian Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines. A (Half) Step Towards Transparency and Deterrence
Posted by Social Science Research Network
The Italian Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines. A (Half) Step Towards Transparency and Deterrence Federico Cesare Guido Ghezzi (Bocconi University) & Gian Diego Pini (University of Milan)
Abstract: In this paper, we examine the new Italian Guidelines on the method of setting fines for antitrust law infringements in the broader context of Italian antitrust public enforcement.
The analysis of the new Guidelines is interesting for at least three reasons. Firstly, in drafting the new guidelines the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) adopted a comprehensive approach, taking into account that the method of setting fines may affect all the other elements of the sanctioning system. Thus, even if the Guidelines deal specifically only with the quantifications of fines, many elements of the new methodology have been designed to affect other important areas of the antitrust enforcement, particularly the leniency programs.
Secondly, the new Guidelines clearly witness a shift towards an antitrust enforcement system based on deterrence. Unfortunately, the ICA’s very formal interpretation of the notion of undertaking undermines, if not completely annuls, the efforts towards heavier fines on naked cartels and exclusionary abuses of dominant position.
Finally, in choosing the quantification method, the ICA largely followed the 2006 EU Guidelines on the method of setting fines. This should not come as a shock considering that Italian antitrust law closely mirrors Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It should be pointed out, however, that the ICA resisted to the pleas of many commentators, urging it to follow other more lenient or in any case different national models. We think that, also in light of the allocation principles laid down in the Notice on the cooperation within the network of European Competition Authorities, a high degree of harmonization between the EU and the Italian antitrust sanctioning systems is beneficial to assure a level playing field for companies operating in the Italian markets.
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand