Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Deutsche Telekom Weighs Mega Merger With T-Mobile US to Form Global Telecom Leader
Apr 22, 2026 by
CPI
Bank Regulators Want to Rewrite the Rules on Money Laundering Enforcement
Apr 22, 2026 by
CPI
RTL Wins Unconditional EU Approval for Sky Deutschland Acquisition
Apr 22, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Seeks Court Victory in AI Copyright Dispute Over Song Lyrics
Apr 22, 2026 by
CPI
NFL Defends Streaming Strategy Amid Federal Scrutiny Over Costs and Access
Apr 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers