Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Statehouses Take Aim at Algorithmic Pricing as Legal Risks Multiply for Businesses
Apr 24, 2026 by
CPI
Two House Bills Aim to Create National Privacy Standards, Preempt State Laws
Apr 23, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Preliminary Settlement With US Anesthesia Partners Over Texas Market Competition
Apr 23, 2026 by
CPI
Warner Bros. Discovery Shareholders Approve Paramount Skydance Takeover
Apr 23, 2026 by
CPI
America Movil’s Claro Signals Interest in New Brazilian Acquisitions
Apr 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers