Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
FTC Targets $15.5B IonQ–SkyWater Chip Tie-Up With New Request
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
Wisconsin Becomes Latest State Seeking to Rein In Prediction Markets
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
Salesforce and Slack Sue Microsoft in UK Over Teams Competition Claims
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
European Broadcasters Urge EU to Focus Digital Rules on Big Tech
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
Microsoft Ends Exclusive Access to OpenAI Technology, Opening Door to Rivals
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Energy & Data Centers
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
AI Data Centers: Competition Law and the Energy Challenge
Apr 27, 2026 by
Charles Whiddington & Domniki Mari
Teaming Up Without Tripping Up: Antitrust Guardrails For Energy Infrastructure Collaborations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Benjamin Huffman, Ann O'Brien & Josh Sturtevant
Mergers Among Electricity Generators: Recent Enforcement and Emerging Trends
Apr 27, 2026 by
Sam Malech & Matt Wohlleben
Energy and Data Centers: Key Competition Considerations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Victoire Binchet, Michael Cousin, Al Mangan & Jugwal Doyen