Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Lupin Subsidiary Reaches $30 Million Settlement With Humana While Denying Allegations
Apr 19, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Halts Nexstar–Tegna Merger Pending Antitrust Case
Apr 19, 2026 by
CPI
US Justice Department Prepares Antitrust Case Against Major Egg Producers
Apr 19, 2026 by
CPI
House GOP Rushing to Advance Federal Privacy Law Before Midterms
Apr 17, 2026 by
CPI
UK Advances Comprehensive Regulatory Framework for Crypto Assets
Apr 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers