Vivien Rose, Apr 01, 2010
To date, the literature on the role of behavioral economics in the context of competition policy has largely focused on the development of the theory and practice of behavioral economics in the analysis of competition cases. It is also useful, however, to consider how arguments about behavioral economics are likely to be received in a judicial setting.
Featured News
General Mills, Mars Accuse Major Sugar Producers of Price-Fixing
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon Seeks to Exclude Big Sellers From Automatic £2.7 Billion UK Class Action
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Tamarack, Headwater Agree to C$10 Billion Canadian Energy Merger
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Google Overhauls European Search to Comply With EU Competition Rules
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
MMG Faces EU Antitrust Warning Over Anglo American Nickel Deal
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring