A PYMNTS Company

U.S.: Antitrust case considered in Supreme Court’s ruling over necessary evidence for class actions

By  |  November 6, 2012

In the case of Comcast vs. Behrend, argued Monday, cable customers from Philadelphia are arguing Comcast has violated antitrust law in its mergers and swaps of cable system providers. The case is one of two, the other involving securities fraud, that will be considered by the Supreme Court in efforts to set a precedent of how much evidence will be needed for a class to be certified in class action cases. The consideration comes in the context of last year’s Wal-Mart Stores vs. Dukes decision in which the Supreme Court threw out the case, ruling there was not enough evidence for the class to have banned together to sue. In response to the Comcast suit, the cable company had asked the Court to address how the Wal-Mart decision could potentially be applied to their case. The justices, however, are not convinced the Wal-Mart ruling could affect the Comcast case.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Full Content: New York Times

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.